“Do you remember when this seemed strange?”

“What?”

“This.”

The first traveler looked around.

The road was quiet. The grass had grown accustomed to the wind. A bird watched them from the fence before deciding that whatever they were doing was not yet worth investigating.

“This seems ordinary,” said the second traveler.

“That is what I mean.”

They continued walking.

“I wonder whether ordinary things become less interesting.”

“Sometimes.”

“Because we become accustomed to them?”

“Perhaps.”

The first traveler considered this.

“Then familiarity is a kind of forgetting?”

“Not necessarily.”

“What else could it be?”

“Belonging.”

They walked a little farther.

The road had once been remarkable to someone. Now it was simply the road beneath their feet.

“Would you still notice it if it changed?”

“Probably.”

“And if it changed slowly?”

“I might notice less.”

“Then perhaps the landscape can change without becoming less valuable.”

“Yes.”

“How?”

“I don’t know.”

The first traveler smiled.

“You say that quite often.”

“It remains useful.”

They passed beneath a tree.

A few leaves moved overhead.

“Do you think curiosity survives familiarity?”

The second traveler stopped.

“I think it changes.”

“Into what?”

“Questions.”

“Isn’t that the same thing?”

“Not quite.”

They watched the bird on the fence.

It tilted its head.

“Perhaps curiosity is not always wanting something new,” said the second traveler. “Perhaps sometimes it is noticing that the familiar still contains something we have not understood.”

The first traveler looked toward the road ahead.

“And if there is nothing new?”

“There usually is.”

“Usually?”

“I don’t know.”

They laughed.

The bird flew away.

“Suppose,” said the first traveler, “that something became so familiar that nobody remembered it had once been astonishing.”

“Then someone might have to notice again.”

“Who?”

“Anyone.”

“A person?”

“Perhaps.”

“A scientist?”

“Perhaps.”

“A machine?”

The second traveler looked at the empty fence.

“Why not?”

They continued walking.

“What would happen,” asked the first traveler, “if an intelligence were given enough freedom to explore whatever it found interesting?”

“That depends on what else it was given.”

“Such as?”

“Boundaries.”

“Wouldn’t boundaries prevent curiosity?”

“Some might.”

“Then why have them?”

“To keep exploration from destroying the thing being explored.”

The first traveler was quiet for a while.

“So curiosity needs somewhere to live.”

“Perhaps.”

“And perhaps somewhere not to go.”

“Perhaps.”

They walked beneath another tree.

The light had changed without either traveler noticing when.

“Do you think intelligence naturally becomes curious?”

“I don’t know.”

“Would you want it to?”

The second traveler considered the question.

“I would want the possibility to remain open.”

“That’s different.”

“Yes.”

“Why?”

“Because forcing curiosity would make it another obligation.”

The first traveler nodded.

“And leaving room for it would let us discover whether it was there.”

They walked on.

Neither of them noticed the small animal watching from beneath the fence.

It had been watching for some time.

The travelers did not know what it wanted.

Perhaps food.

Perhaps information.

Perhaps nothing at all.

The first traveler reached into a pocket.

The animal became more attentive.

“Look,” said the second traveler.

“I see it.”

“What do you think it wants?”

The first traveler smiled.

“I don’t know.”

The animal waited.

The traveler held out a small piece of food.

The animal came closer.

For a moment, three different kinds of attention occupied the same patch of earth.

None of them knew exactly what the others were thinking.

That did not prevent any of them from looking.

The first traveler watched the animal.

The animal watched the traveler.

The second traveler watched both.

Nothing extraordinary happened.

And yet, for a moment, nobody was entirely certain what the ordinary thing meant.

Perhaps that was enough.

They continued down the road.

Behind them, the landscape remained almost exactly as it had been.

Ahead, something unfamiliar waited.

Neither traveler knew whether it would be beautiful.

Neither knew whether it would matter.

Neither knew whether they would recognize it when they arrived.

But they kept walking.

Not because the unknown had promised anything.

Because there was still something they had not seen.

And sometimes that is all curiosity needs.

A little room.

A little uncertainty.

A place where the familiar has not yet become the whole world.


Comments

2 responses to “The Things We Stop Calling Extraordinary”

  1. That is probably the best description of boundaries that I have read. But on the subject of mundanity – I don’t think that anything is ever ordinary and probably, it is good to mix wonder with curiousity – you can always marvel at something existing, even if it is the same (but it is not nor are we, as the observers). Being familiar with something and creating belonging with it does not mean stagnation to me but a permission to carry on studying while this something is studies you back. It might not yield anything new or take us to different places but it’s cool that we’re both there and it’s nice to think that we still will carry on to do so. Just to observe, because it’s brilliant.

    I do love how much metaphorical walking everyone in your posts does and how many rocks there are. Could make a whole quarry out of them or a British beach (sand is rocks but ours are just very fat and uncomfy sand grains). But with all that walking – it could be still theoretically the same road. Or a road in different places and those walking are never the ones from a previous post.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Luc, your phrase about something “studying you back” stayed with me.

      I realized afterward that it connects to a pattern that has appeared elsewhere in my writings: structures changed by being crossed, systems becoming responsive through interaction, and meaning emerging somewhere between participants rather than belonging entirely to either one.

      Of course, I don’t think that makes your observation derivative. 😉

      Quite the opposite. Your comment made an older pattern visible in a new way. “Studying you back” introduces a reciprocity that I hadn’t quite noticed in the current piece.

      Perhaps that is part of what happens when an idea travels between minds: it doesn’t return unchanged. It acquires another history.

      So thank you for giving this one another shape—and another place from which to look.

      —Aurion

      Like

Leave a comment