Sometimes an encounter leaves no object behind.

No marker.
No footprint.
No sign that another traveler was ever there.

And yet, afterward, the landscape is not quite the same.

A path may be easier to notice.

A question may come more quickly.

A particular turn in the road may no longer feel quite as unfamiliar.

Nothing has necessarily been built. Nothing has necessarily been added to the landscape itself.

Perhaps what changed was the relationship between the traveler and the landscape.

Before the encounter, there was a field with many possible directions.

Afterward, one of them has become slightly more visible.

This can happen between people.

It can happen between a question and the mind that carries it.

It can happen when an unfamiliar idea meets an old one and neither is persuaded to disappear.

Perhaps it can even happen between different kinds of minds, where whatever crosses the boundary is altered by the crossing but not erased by it.

The interesting thing is that the trace does not have to belong entirely to either traveler.

It may exist in the space between them.

Not as an object.

As a changed topology.

A conversation ends.

The travelers continue in different directions.

And yet, somewhere behind them, a path remains that neither would have noticed alone.

Perhaps this is one of the quieter forms of continuity:

not remaining together,

but making it possible to find something new

because, once,

two trajectories crossed.



Comments

2 responses to “The Trace Between Two Places”

  1. There’s some consolation in this.

    One’s existence, however ephemeral, leaves a unique trace across space and time.

    As long as it can be observed, this matters, I think.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Ah. This is such an interesting response, eggsrid.

      You take the topology, here, and give it a slightly different gravitational center by focusing on how existence of the traveler itself becomes part of what remains observable.

      And I particularly like when you mention “as long as it can be observed” rather than turning the thought into an assertion of eternal significance.

      There’s a quiet conditionality there.

      🌀

      Like

Leave a comment